Wiktionary:Taberna/Arquivo/2016

Wikimania 2016 Scholarships - Deadline soon!

Axuda a traducir á túa lingua

A reminder - applications for scholarships for Wikimania 2016 in Esino Lario, Italy, are closing soon! Please get your applications in by January 9th. To apply, visit the page below:

• Wikimania 2016 Scholarships

Patrick Earley (WMF) via MediaWiki message delivery (conversa) 5 de xaneiro de 2016 ás 01:49 (UTC)

2016 WMF Strategy consultation

Axuda a traducir á túa lingua

Hello, all.

The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has launched a consultation to help create and prioritize WMF strategy beginning July 2016 and for the 12 to 24 months thereafter. This consultation will be open, on Meta, from 18 January to 26 February, after which the Foundation will also use these ideas to help inform its Annual Plan. (More on our timeline can be found on that Meta page.)

Your input is welcome (and greatly desired) at the Meta discussion, 2016 Strategy/Community consultation.

Apologies for English, where this is posted on a non-English project. We thought it was more important to get the consultation translated as much as possible, and good headway has been made there in some languages. There is still much to do, however! We created m:2016 Strategy/Translations to try to help coordinate what needs translation and what progress is being made. :)

If you have questions, please reach out to me on my talk page or on the strategy consultation's talk page or by email to mdennis@wikimedia.org.

I hope you'll join us! Maggie Dennis via MediaWiki message delivery (conversa) 18 de xaneiro de 2016 ás 19:06 (UTC)

Open Call for Individual Engagement Grants

Axuda a traducir á túa lingua:

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) program is accepting proposals until April 12th to fund new tools, research, outreach efforts, and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers. Whether you need a small or large amount of funds (up to $30,000 USD), IEGs can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.

• Submit a grant request or draft your proposal in IdeaLab
• Get help with your proposal in an upcoming Hangout session
• Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants

With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) 31 de marzo de 2016 ás 17:47 (UTC)

Server switch 2016

The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its newest data center in Dallas. This will make sure Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to conduct a planned test. This test will show whether they can reliably switch from one data center to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.

They will switch all traffic to the new data center on Tuesday, 19 April.
On Thursday, 21 April, they will switch back to the primary data center.

Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop during those two switches. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.

You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.

• You will not be able to edit for approximately 15 to 30 minutes on Tuesday, 19 April and Thursday, 21 April, starting at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 07:00 PDT).

If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.

Other effects:

• Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped.

Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.

• There will be a code freeze for the week of 18 April.

No non-essential code deployments will take place.

This test was originally planned to take place on March 22. April 19th and 21st are the new dates. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. They will post any changes on that schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community. /User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17 de abril de 2016 ás 21:07 (UTC)

Compact Links coming soon to this wiki

Axuda a traducir á túa lingua

Screenshot of Compact Language Links interlanguage list

Hello, I wanted to give a heads up about an upcoming feature for this wiki which you may seen already in the Tech News. Compact Language Links has been available as a beta-feature on all Wikimedia wikis since 2014. With compact language links enabled, users are shown a much shorter list of languages on the interlanguage link section of an article (see image). This will be enabled as a feature in the soon for all users, which can be turned on or off using a preference setting. We look forward to your feedback and please do let us know if you have any questions. Details about Compact Language Links can be read in the project documentation.

Due to the large scale enablement of this feature, we have had to use MassMessage for this announcement and as a result it is only written in English. We will really appreciate if this message can be translated for other users of this wiki. The main announcement can also be translated on this page. Thank you. On behalf of the Wikimedia Language team: Runa Bhattacharjee (WMF) (talk)-29 de xuño de 2016 ás 13:06 (UTC)

Compact Language Links enabled in this wiki today

Axuda a traducir á túa lingua

Screenshot of Compact Language Links interlanguage list

Compact Language Links has been available as a beta-feature on all Wikimedia wikis since 2014. With compact language links enabled, users are shown a much shorter list of languages on the interlanguage link section of an article (see image). Based on several factors, this shorter list of languages is expected to be more relevant for them and valuable for finding similar content in a language known to them. More information about compact language links can be found in the documentation.

From today onwards, compact language links has been enabled as the default listing of interlanguage links on this wiki. However, using the button at the bottom, you will be able to see a longer list of all the languages the article has been written in. The setting for this compact list can be changed by using the checkbox under User Preferences -> Appearance -> Languages

The compact language links feature has been tested extensively by the Wikimedia Language team, which developed it. However, in case there are any problems or other feedback please let us know on the project talk page. It is to be noted that on some wikis the presence of an existing older gadget that was used for a similar purpose may cause an interference for compact language list. We would like to bring this to the attention of the admins of this wiki. Full details are on this phabricator ticket (in English).

Due to the large scale enablement of this feature, we have had to use MassMessage for this announcement and as a result it is only written in English. We will really appreciate if this message can be translated for other users of this wiki. Thank you. On behalf of the Wikimedia Language team: Runa Bhattacharjee (WMF) (talk)-1 de xullo de 2016 ás 03:05 (UTC)

Open call for Project Grants

Axuda a traducir á túa lingua:

Greetings! The Project Grants program is accepting proposals from July 1st to August 2nd to fund new tools, research, offline outreach (including editathon series, workshops, etc), online organizing (including contests), and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers.

Whether you need a small or large amount of funds, Project Grants can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.

• Submit a grant request or draft your proposal in IdeaLab
• Get help with your proposal in an upcoming Hangout session
• Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants or Project and Event Grants

Also accepting candidates to join the Project Grants Committee through July 15.

With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) 5 de xullo de 2016 ás 15:25 (UTC)

neolinguas reconstrutas

Isto que semella o nome dun xogador de baloncesto lituano ou letón refírese a categoría:Protoalgonquino, categoría:Protocéltico, categoría:Protoeslavo e categoría:Protoxermánico. Igual que Norrin hai anos, estaba ben ir pensando na posibilidade de que algún día se engadisen sistematicamente algunhas linguas reconstruídas. O máis importante para nós debería ser o indoeuropeo (IE) ou protoindoeuropeo (PIE), que aínda non existe. Varias características para ter en conta:

• Habería que decidir que nome darlle (IE ou PIE, ou mesmo se IE=PIE ou non)
• Só existen na en.wiki e na chinesa zh.wiki
• O bo que ten é que non é un número descomunal de entradas (o que é unha desgraza para outras cousas)
• Nas versións destas linguas contan cun Espazo "Reconstruction"
• Tamén (polo menos na en.wiki) lles engaden o famoso * de reconstrución. Eu optaría por non poñerllo (por outra banda, como nas outras por certo)
• Non temos moitos especialistas no tema, principalmente Servando da Galipedia e eu estou comezando a entrar no tema. Que eu saiba. Tampouco sei nas universidades, Trabazo en USC (Mª Teresa Amado e Mª Mercedes Díaz) e quizais García-Miguel en UVigo.
• Existe certa variedade na metodoloxía de transcrición do PIE, por unha banda no tempo (dende Pokorny 1922-39 ata despois de asumirse a teoría laringal), por outra no autor (laringalistas vs. glotalistas, aínda que eu defendería a primeira por estar máis xeralizada e documentable) e para rematar por fonte (dicionarios de lingua xeral, etimolóxicos, internet). Deberían (e podería) seguirse os criterios da raíz PIE e os modificadores xeralmente admitidos: s móbil, extensións, criterios para a orde na cadea da raíz, transliteración de ditongos, etc. Na en.wiki teñen eso medianamente avanzado
• Xa que non temos nada disto e case nada dos devanditos PCe, PSl e PXm, temos a sorte de comezar ben dende cero: eu recomendaría un sistema para os chamados descendentes ó estilo de wikispecies. Dado que son reconstrucións, eu faría imperativo marcalos (como se di en en:Wiktionary:AINE non ten sentido: se non se marcan, de onde se sacan?)
• Tamén é certo que hai algunhas fontes abertas dispoñibles en rede, polo que hai certa base de onde sacar cando non saibamos
• Tamén polo dito faría obrigatorio marcar a fonte

Ideas? Permiso para ir facendo algo? Voto de confianza respecto a ir chafullando no tema? Sobreira (parlez) 11 de xullo de 2016 ás 12:42 (UTC)

Voto de confianza, tanto para este tema como para outros nos que seguro tes moito que dicir.

Eu optaría por un novo espacio de nomes como no en.wikt, pero non vexo preciso indicar a lingua no nome da páxina (Reconstruction:átta en vez de Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/átta).

Poderíase usar para palabras hipotéticas de linguas documentadas (por exemplo no latín: *acutiāre, *captiāre, *retĭna, etc)

De acordo co de marcar sempre a fonte. Deberíase facer en todas as linguas, sobre todo nas máis difíciles de documentar. Ocórreseme que poderiamos contar cunha nova lapela para fontes e citas ó estilo da Citações do pt.wikt.

[ Furagaitas * ] 12 de xullo de 2016 ás 09:22 (UTC)

Respondo rápido que teño que marchar. Vexo que Calq está metendo etimoloxías. Estaría ben este tema para ilas profundando ata o que se saiba de PIE. Respecto ó das lapelas, vou investigar xq non as coñezo. Respecto ó do sistema para descendentes vou facer unha proba do sistema wikispecies para que vexades como funcionarían. Sobreira (parlez) 12 de xullo de 2016 ás 10:20 (UTC)

• Para o das fontes (refírome a fontes PIE deste tipo) on lle vexo eu moito sentido (máis ben, necesidade) ó das citas tal como está en pt:Citações:pau-brasil seguindo pt:Wiktionary:Citações. Refíreste a iso? Podería quizais usarse para a proba que menciono por terceira vez e que a ver se teño algún momento de facer para amosarvos. Sobreira (parlez) 12 de xullo de 2016 ás 19:08 (UTC)

A idea sería non sobrecargar as páxinas con máis información, que xa teñen cabeceiras e puntos a reo. Na nova lapela irían as fontes (algo pouco estilado ata o de agora, e alí poderiamos expraiarnos o que quixésemos) e as citas (como no caso portugués).

É só unha idea, como dicías que partimos de cero... Pero non teño moito tempo para afondar no tema. [ Furagaitas * ] 13 de xullo de 2016 ás 08:55 (UTC)

Dígoo porque se está noutra páxina non poderemos usar o { { references } }. Sobreira (parlez) 14 de xullo de 2016 ás 17:29 (UTC)

Arquivo

E non podemos ir arquivando boa parte da taberna? Polo menos ata o 2016, porque dende 2010 non se fai, e anteriormente fixose de só un ano. Sobreira (parlez) 14 de xullo de 2016 ás 17:29 (UTC)

O meu bot pode facerlo, si la comunidade concorda. MarcoAurelio (conversa) 9 de agosto de 2016 ás 13:01 (UTC)

Feito. Pra os arquivos véxase Wiktionary:Taberna/Arquivo. --MarcoAurelio (conversa) 12 de agosto de 2016 ás 14:23 (UTC)

Candidatura bot

Boas. Anuncio Wiktionary:Bots/Peticións_de_aprobación#MABot para tarefas de mantenimiento xeral e arquivo da Taberna. Grazas, MarcoAurelio (conversa) 9 de agosto de 2016 ás 13:11 (UTC)

Save/Publish

The Editing team is planning to change the name of the “Gardar a páxina” button to “Publicar a páxina” and “Publicar os cambios”. “Publicar a páxina” will be used when you create a new page. “Publicar os cambios” will be used when you change an existing page. The names will be consistent in all editing environments.[1][2]

This change will probably happen during the week of 30 August 2016. The change will be announced in Tech News when it happens.

If you are fluent in a language other than English, please check the status of translations at translatewiki.net for “Publicar a páxina” and “Publicar os cambios”.

The main reason for this change is to avoid confusion for new editors. Repeated user research studies with new editors have shown that some new editors believed that “Gardar a páxina” would save a private copy of a new page in their accounts, rather than permanently publishing their changes on the web. It is important for this part of the user interface to be clear, since it is difficult to remove public information after it is published. We believe that the confusion caused by the “Gardar a páxina” button increases the workload for experienced editors, who have to clean up the information that people unintentionally disclose, and report it to the functionaries and stewards to suppress it. Clarifying what the button does will reduce this problem.

Beyond that, the goal is to make all the wikis and languages more consistent, and some wikis made this change many years ago. The Legal team at the Wikimedia Foundation supports this change. Making the edit interface easier to understand will make it easier to handle licensing and privacy questions that may arise.

Any help pages or other basic documentation about how to edit pages will also need to be updated, on-wiki and elsewhere. On wiki pages, you can use the wikitext codes {{int:Publishpage}} and {{int:Publishchanges}} to display the new labels in the user's preferred language. For the language settings in your account preferences, these wikitext codes produce “Publicar a páxina” and “Publicar os cambios”.

Please share this news with community members who teach new editors and with others who may be interested.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 9 de agosto de 2016 ás 18:02 (UTC)

Saúdos

Son Lmbuga, noutro tempo Raspiñeiro, espero que vos vaia moi ben. A estas alturaas, considerando que creaba máis de 20 palabras diarias, levaría miles. Botoume fóra un usuario que non vou cualificar, pero, se continúa aquí, as cousas non mellorarían moito, pois estaba máis dedicado a amolar do que a colaborar--Lmbuga (conversa) 8 de setembro de 2016 ás 00:57 (UTC)

Se continúa aquí, agradezo ser bloqueado. Nunca serei bloqueado con tanto gusto e de maneira tan absurda.--Lmbuga (conversa) 8 de setembro de 2016 ás 00:59 (UTC)

En caso de que non estea (non lembro o nome do individuo) quizais volva. Por favor, segues estando aí?--Lmbuga (conversa) 8 de setembro de 2016 ás 01:01 (UTC)

Ah! Chamábase Furagaitas. Se continúa por aquí, eu non pinto nada--Lmbuga (conversa) 8 de setembro de 2016 ás 01:03 (UTC)

Ao lembrar o nome puiden comprobar que segue: Logo eu desaparezo--Lmbuga

Incrible: Inda le,mbro o contrasinal de User:Raspiñeiro. Bloqueádeme. Abofé que debedes bloquearme inda que todo o mundo saiba quen son, inda que non me beneficiase de nada, inda que tivese un comportamento ético e nunca, nin sequera, alternase identidades (salvo nesta mensaxe).

Vamos Furagaitas, dálle!!--Raspiñeiro (conversa) 8 de setembro de 2016 ás 01:20 (UTC)

RevisionSlider

From September 13th on, RevisionSlider will be available as a beta feature in your wiki. The RevisionSlider adds a slider view to the diff page, so that you can easily move between revisions. The feature fulfills a wish from the German Community’s Technical Wishlist. Everyone is invited to test the feature and we hope that it will serve you well in your work!

Birgit Müller (WMDE) 12 de setembro de 2016 ás 15:08 (UTC)

Grants to improve your project

Axuda a traducir á túa lingua:

Greetings! The Project Grants program is currently accepting proposals for funding. There is just over a week left to submit before the October 11 deadline. If you have ideas for software, offline outreach, research, online community organizing, or other projects that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers, start your proposal today! Please encourage others who have great ideas to apply as well. Support is available if you want help turning your idea into a grant request.

• Submit a grant request
• Get help: In IdeaLab or an upcoming Hangout session
• Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants or Project and Event Grants

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 30 de setembro de 2016 ás 20:11 (UTC)

Creative Commons 4.0

Ola! Escribo en nome da Fundación Wikimedia para convidarvos a comentar sobre a proposta de cambio da licenza CC BY-SA 3.0 pola licenza CC BY-SA 4.0 en todos os proxectos da Wikimedia. A consulta realizarase entre o 5 de outubro e o 8 de novembro de 2016. Esperamos recibir unha morea de puntos de vista e opinións. Por favor, se estades interesados, formade parte da conversa en Meta-Wiki. Joe Sutherland 6 de outubro de 2016 ás 00:18 (UTC)

Password reset

I apologise that this message is in English. ⧼Centralnotice-shared-help-translate⧽

We are having a problem with attackers taking over wiki accounts with privileged user rights (for example, admins, bureaucrats, oversighters, checkusers). It appears that this may be because of weak or reused passwords.

Community members are working along with members of multiple teams at the Wikimedia Foundation to address this issue.

In the meantime, we ask that everyone takes a look at the passwords they have chosen for their wiki accounts. If you know that you've chosen a weak password, or if you've chosen a password that you are using somewhere else, please change those passwords.

Select strong passwords – eight or more characters long, and containing letters, numbers, and punctuation. Joe Sutherland (conversa) / MediaWiki message delivery (conversa) 13 de novembro de 2016 ás 23:59 (UTC)

Adding to the above section (Password reset)

Please accept my apologies - that first line should read "Help with translations!". Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) / MediaWiki message delivery (conversa) 14 de novembro de 2016 ás 00:11 (UTC)

Redirecciones rotas

[es] Moi boas. Mi expresión escrita en gallego está bastante oxidada así que para procurar no quedar en evidencia usaré el castellano, con permiso de la audiencia. Resulta que hay 170 páginas que redireccionan a páginas que no existen. La labor de mi bot es precísamente la de arreglar redirecciones dobles y marcar para borrar redirecciones rotas. Mi pregunta es, ¿sirven de algo esas páginas ahí listadas o podemos eliminarlas? No quisiera que mi bot marcase cientos de páginas para borrar para luego tener que revertirlo. Aguardo vuestras instrucciones. Saludos, --MarcoAurelio (conversa) 11 de novembro de 2016 ás 15:09 (UTC)

• Boas. Na miña opinión, si que se deberían de borrar, de feito xa o fixera algunha vez. Tampouco entendo o uso de redireccións no wiktionary, porque cada entrada podía ter o seu contido propio, o que sería a explicación desa redirección.--Calq (conversa) 11 de novembro de 2016 ás 22:52 (UTC)

• Ola. Pola miña parte, non son moi partidario de crear redireccións no Galizionario, pero comezouse a facer para indicar que certas entradas non eran normativamente correctas. O propio sería desenvolver estas entradas con ligazóns ás páxinas correctas, pero tampouco temos ben definido como deberían ser estas entradas (tipos de entradas, contido, formato, mensaxes de advertencia,...). En definitiva, crear redireccións non creo que sexa o camiño que debamos seguir, aínda que tampouco creo que debamos eliminar o traballo xa feito, que considero un paso provisional. Vexo máis útil crear e desenvolver as entradas cara as que redirixen esas redireccións. [ Furagaitas * ] 23 de novembro de 2016 ás 11:59 (UTC)

Sorbio / sorabo / sorabio / sorábico

Boas a todos! Estiven buscando referencias en galego para o nome desta lingua, xa que a RAG non se pronuncia. Atopei as seguintes:

• Para sorbio:
  • [http://www.cirp.es/pub/docs/cfg/cfg07.pdf Versión baixoalemá da Constitución do Estado alemán de Bremen. Tradución de

termos monoverbais, pluriverbais e colocacións da linguaxe xurídica a unha lingua non estandarizada] - En "Cadernos de Fraseoloxía Galega", do Centro Ramón Piñeiro.

• • OS ESTUDIOS EMPÍRICOS SOBRE A SITUACIÓN SOCIOLINGÜÍSTICA DO GALEGO - En "Cadernos de Lingua 19", da RAG.
• Para sorabo:
  • Entrada no DiGalego de IrIndo
  • A integración das linguas rexionais ou minoritarias no Espazo Europeo da Educación Superior: O galego como caso de estudo
• Para sorábico:
  • Locucións espalladas por Europa e máis alá.

Logo deste repaso breve, entendo que hai fontes para admitir como válidos e sinónimos "sorbio" e "sorabo". Porén, en busca dunha maior cohesión lóxica no Galizionario, penso que debemos tomar unha como forma preferente para categorías e demáis, xa que polo de agora estamos a empregar tanto "Alto sorabio" como "Baixo sorabo". Tendo en conta que "sorabio" non ten apoio ningún, e que a única forma apoiada directamente nun dicionario (neste caso o de Ir Indo) é sorabo, vouna mover para alí. Saúdos! --Norrin strange (conversa) 22 de novembro de 2016 ás 09:56 (UTC)

Perfecto!! [ Furagaitas * ] 23 de novembro de 2016 ás 11:40 (UTC)

New way to edit wikitext

Summary: There's a new opt-in Beta Feature of a wikitext mode for the visual editor. Please go try it out.

We in the Wikimedia Foundation's Editing department are responsible for making editing better for all our editors, new and experienced alike. We've been slowly improving the visual editor based on feedback, user tests, and feature requests. However, that doesn't work for all our user needs: whether you need to edit a wikitext talk page, create a template, or fix some broken reference syntax, sometimes you need to use wikitext, and many experienced editors prefer it.

Consequently, we've planned a "wikitext mode" for the visual editor for a long time. It provides as much of the visual editor's features as possible, for those times that you need or want wikitext. It has the same user interface as the visual editor, including the same toolbar across the top with the same buttons. It provides access to the citoid service for formatting citations, integrated search options for inserting images, and the ability to add new templates in a simple dialog. Like in the visual editor, if you paste in formatted text copied from another page, then formatting (such as bolding) will automatically be converted into wikitext.

All wikis now have access to this mode as a Beta Feature. When enabled, it replaces your existing wikitext editor everywhere. If you don't like it, you can reverse this at any time by turning off the Beta Feature in your preferences. We don't want to surprise anyone, so it's strictly an opt-in-only Beta Feature. It won't switch on automatically for anyone, even if you have previously checked the box to "Activar automaticamente case todas as novas características en probas".

The new wikitext edit mode is based on the visual editor, so it requires JavaScript (as does the current wikitext editor). It doesn't work with gadgets that have only been designed for the older one (and vice versa), so some users will miss gadgets they find important. We're happy to work with gadget authors to help them update their code to work with both editors. We're not planning to get rid of the current main wikitext editor on desktop in the foreseeable future. We're also not going to remove the existing ability to edit plain wikitext without JavaScript. Finally, though it should go without saying, if you prefer to continue using the current wikitext editor, then you may so do.

This is an early version, and we'd love to know what you think so we can make it better. Please leave feedback about the new mode on the feedback page. You may write comments in any language. Thank you.

James Forrester (Product Manager, Editing department, Wikimedia Foundation) --14 de decembro de 2016 ás 19:32 (UTC)

Wikidata for Wiktionary: let’s get ready for lexicographical data!

Hello all,

Sorry for writing this message in English, please feel free to translate it in your own language below.

The Wikidata development team will start working on integrating lexicographical data in the knowledge base soon and we want to make sure we do this together with you.

Wikidata is a constantly evolving project and after four years of existence, we start with implementing support for Wiktionary editors and content, by allowing you to store and improve lexicographical data, in addition to the concepts already maintained by thousands of editors on Wikidata.

We have been working on this idea for almost three years and improving it with a lot of inputs from community members to understand Wiktionary processes.

Starting this project, we hope that the editors will be able to collaborate across Wiktionaries more easily. We expect to increase the number of editors and visibility of languages, and we want to provide the groundwork for new tools for editors.

Our development plan contains several phases in order to build the structure to include lexicographical data:

• creating automatic interwiki links on Wiktionary,
• creating new entity types for lexemes, senses, and forms on Wikidata,
• providing data access to Wikidata from Wiktionary
• improving the display of lexicographical information on Wikidata.

During the next months, we will do our best to provide you the technical structure to store lexicographical data on Wikidata and use it on Wiktionary. Don’t hesitate to discuss this within your local community, and give us feedback about your needs and the particularities of your languages.

Information about supporting lexicographical entities on Wikidata is available on this page. You can find an overview of the project, the detail of the development plan, answers to frequently asked questions, and a list of people ready to help us. If you want to have general discussions and questions about the project, please use the general talk page, as we won’t be able to follow all the talk pages on Wiktionaries. If you don’t feel comfortable with English, you can write in your own language and hopefully someone will volunteer to translate.

Bests regards, Lea Lacroix (WMDE) (talk) 13 de setembro de 2016 ás 13:17 (UTC)